Miscellanies Upon Various Subjects — Reading Notes
Edition facts
Miscellanies Upon Various Subjects — Reading Notes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 56,555 words, 4 hr 6 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Superstition,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
College was the author, but was not. Whereupon Mr. Aubrey, a pretender to Antiquities, having been contemporary to A. Wood's elder brother in Trin. Coll. and well acquainted with him, he thought, that he might be as well acquainted with A. W. himself, Whereupon repairing to his lodgings, and telling him who he was, he got into his acquaintance, talked to him about his studies, and offered him what assistance he could make, in order to the completion of the work that he was in hand with. Mr. Aubrey was then in sparkish garb, came to town with his man and two horses, spent high, and flung out A. W. in all his recknings. But his estate of 70011 per an. being afterwards sold and he reserving nothing of it to himself, liv'd afterwards in very sorry condition, and at length made shift to rub out by hanging on Edm. Wyld, Esq., living in Blomesbury near London, on James Carle of Abendon, whose first wife was related to him, and on Sr Joh. Aubrey his kinsman, living sometimes in Glamorganshire and sometimes at Borstall near Brill in Bucks. He was a shiftless person, roving and magotie-headed, and sometimes little better than crased. And being exceedingly credulous, would stuff his many letters sent to A. W. with folliries and misinformations, which would sometimes guid him into the paths of errour." This example of bad English, and worse taste, was written after twenty-five years acquaintance! In singular contrast to it, is a letter of Aubrey to Wood, charging him, it is true, with an abuse of confidence and detraction, but urging his complaint in terms which sufficiently evince the kindly and affectionate nature of the writer.
Malone, in his " Historical Account of the English Stage," has done Aubrey justice; and his remarks may properly find a place here. " That the greater part of his (Aubrey's) life was devoted to literary pursuits, is ascertained by the works which he has published, the correspondence which he held with many eminent men, and the collections which he left in manuscript and which are now reposited in the Ashmolean Museum. Among these collections is a curious account of our English Poets, and many other writers. While Wood was preparing his Athenae Oxonienses, this manuscript was lent to him, as appears from many queries in his handwriting in the margin; and his account of Milton, with whom Aubrey was intimately acquainted, is (as has been observed by Mr. Warton) literally transcribed from thence." After alluding to the quarrel between Wood and Aubrey, he continues, "But whatever Wood in a peevish humour may have said or thought of Mr. Aubrey, by whose labours he has highly profited, or however fantastical Aubrey may have been on the subject of chemistry and ghosts, his character for veracity has never been impeached, and as a very diligent Antiquary, his testimony is worthy of attention. Mr. Toland, who was well acquainted with him, and certainly a better judge of men than Wood, gives this character of him: 'Though he was extremely superstitious, or seemed to be so, yet he was a very honest man, and most accurate in his account of matter of fact. But the facts he knew, not the reflections he made, were what I wanted.'"
Aubrey preserved, amidst all his troubles, an intimacy with the men of Science and Letters of his day, and with them formed the nucleus of the Royal Society. Some of the principal incidents of his life are briefly detailed in the following autobiographical memoranda, entitled
ACCIDENTS OF JOHN AUBREY.
Born at Easton-Piers, March 1625,6, about sun-rising; very weak and like to Dye, & therefore christned that morning before Prayer. I think I have heard my mother say I had an Ague shortly after I was born.
1629. About three or four years old I had a grievous ague, I can remember it. I got not health till eleven or twelve, but had sickness of Vomiting for 12 hours every fortnight for years, then it came monthly for then quarterly & then half yearly, the last was in June 1642. This sickness nipt my strength in the bud.
1633. At eight years old I had an issue (naturall) in the coronall sutor of my head, which continued running till 21.
1634. October, I had a violent fevor, it was like to have carried me off 'twas the most dangerous sickness that ever I had,
1639. About 1639 or 1643 I had the measills, but that was nothing, I was hardly sick. Monday after Easter week my Uncle's Nag ranne away with me & gave me a very dangerous fall.
1642 May 3. Entered at Trinity College.
1643 April and May, the Small Pox at Oxon; after left that ingeniouse place & for three years led a sad life in the Country.
John Aubrey's Miscellanies Upon Various Subjects is a cabinet of wonders from the 17th century, assembling reports of day-fatality, portents, apparitions, and second sight. Rather than a systematic treatise, it offers a series of discrete observations, each grounded in a specific anecdote or classical reference. Aubrey draws on personal acquaintance—a kinsman at the Battle of Naseby, a witness to Oliver Cromwell's laughter before Dunbar—alongside Livy and Cicero. The result is a work that hovers between folklore, natural philosophy, and personal testimony, inviting the reader to weigh evidence without demanding belief.
Anecdotal Authority and Personal Witness
Aubrey repeatedly grounds his accounts in named individuals and his own circle. He reports that a kinsman, Colonel J. P., testified to Cromwell's fit of laughter before Naseby, and that another acquaintance observed the same at Dunbar. This method—citing a specific person known to him—lends a documentary air to otherwise extraordinary claims. Elsewhere, he reproduces a letter from Jesuit missionaries describing an earthquake that confirmed a prophecy. The mix of oral testimony, correspondence, and classical quotation creates a layered texture: Aubrey is not merely compiling lore but curating voices. The reader is constantly reminded that these stories come from somewhere, from someone, even when the events themselves strain credibility.
Classical Precedents and Christian Framing
Aubrey frequently anchors his marvels in ancient authorities. He cites Livy on the voice that warned of the Gauls' approach, and Cicero's De Natura Deorum on divine inspiration. These classical references do more than lend prestige; they provide a template for interpreting modern occurrences. When Aubrey discusses impulses or prophetic dreams, he moves seamlessly from a Roman anecdote to a contemporary English case. The effect is to suggest that such phenomena are not aberrant but recurrent, part of a pattern visible across centuries. Yet he also hedges: 'I will not pretend to understand them,' he writes, leaving room for both natural and supernatural explanations. This cautious stance reflects the tension between empirical curiosity and orthodox piety that runs through the collection.
The Texture of the Extraordinary
Aubrey's details are often strikingly concrete. Cromwell's laughter is described as 'excessive,' his eyes 'sparkled with spirits.' A prophecy of a father's death is said to have been uttered 'seven hours' beforehand. These specifics—a time, a gesture, a facial expression—give the narratives a vivid, almost tactile quality. The same precision appears in the account of the Warminster field, where at the very hour of the Battle of Bosworth a parishioner 'took two sheaves.' Such details anchor the supernatural in the mundane: a harvest field, a clock, a known battle. Aubrey does not explain how these connections work; he simply presents them as observed. The effect is to make the reader feel the strangeness of ordinary life, where portents might be hiding in plain sight.
Readers approaching Miscellanies Upon Various Subjects should expect a mosaic rather than a monograph. Each entry can be taken on its own terms, as a curiosity or a piece of intellectual history. Aubrey's voice—learned, skeptical, yet open—makes him an engaging guide through this borderland between belief and inquiry. The work rewards those who dip in and out, following the threads of a name, a place, or a recurring motif.
There’s something about old books that feel like whispers from another room—Aubrey’s notes on apparitions and second sight left that quiet ache with me, the way a half-remembered dream does. It reminded me of the gentle, lingering presence in Robert Louis Stevenson: A Record, an Estimate, and a Memorial — Background and Themes, where a life is traced so softly it feels like a hand resting on your shoulder.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.