The Illiterate Digest — Story, Setting & Ideas
Edition facts
The source record for The Illiterate Digest — Story, Setting & Ideas measures this digital text at 55,546 words, 4 hr 2 min estimated reading time, and 43 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “American wit and humor,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
I never used before in my life and I hope it fits in, I read it in some War Novel) each other for the Publishing rights and assured profits, they of course felt that through my wide Literary acquaintance, gained during years of association at the Democratic National Convention, and the late World Series with some of the best contemporary Writers of modern times, I should through my Literary standing and personal friendship, allow some of them to have the honor of penning the introduction to this Time Table of National Catastrophes.
William Emporia Allen White was my first thought, on account of his having a middle name, which always sounds Literary, even if its owner is not. Then I had heard he himself had written a Book once, and by now should know what Introductions should not be. Then he went home and announced himself as a Candidate for Governor. So that eliminated him from my thoughts. To have a big broad-minded book have any narrow Political endorsement would mean certain calamity among people who think. To run for Governor is bad enough, But to run for Governor of Kansas and then write an Introduction of my worthy efforts, would simply make the book a laughing stock.
Then my thoughts turned to Arthur Brisbane, I don’t know what I could have been eating that my thoughts should have done such a mental somersault. But I guess it was because I had known Arthur for years,--I knew him before William Randolph Hearst started working for him. I approached him on it, and he said, Sorry Will but what I write must point a moral, there must be a lesson in every paragraph; mine must not only be news but it must be instructive news. For instance, I read China will not go to war on rainy days. What does that bit of news mean to the individual that dont think? Nothing! What does it mean to me? It means that a Chinaman would rather get shot than wet. It points a moral to peace: Have all so-called civilized Nations stop wars on rainy days. Then hold all wars in Portland, Oregon where it rains every day, and you will eliminate Wars and have universal Peace.
So he could see no particular Moral in writing an Introduction to my book, unless it was that Books should not depend entirely on their introductions as they do now. So I next thought of my friend Irvin Cobb. I had set next to him at so many Speakers Tables, at banquets, and had always given him any little extras that I might not want. Ice Cream and Sweets and things like that he just loves and ruins them at a Banquet. Well he was going Duck shooting down in Louisiana and said he wouldn’t miss one Duck for the pleasure of writing the Introduction to the Encyclopedia Brittanica. So you just let the old fat thing try to get my Ice Cream at another Banquet.
Of course Ring Lardner was one of my very first thoughts, because I knew he could add the little touch of comedy that the book really needed. I went to him and told him that I only wanted something light and airy, maybe just one good joke would do the trick and take away from the serious nature of the Book. He is not only a Humorist but has got plenty money to show that he is. He said before he shook hands with me, What is there in it? I said well this is just a kind of an honorary thing, a kind of courtesy from one Author to another. He then asked me why should he give me a joke for nothing? He could put the joke into his Sunday Newspaper Article; then he could put the joke into his weekly Newspaper Cartoon; then he could sell it to a Musical Comedy and they would tell it so bad it would sound new. Then the Movies would buy it and make a drama out of it; then he would still hold the Phonograph, and broadcasting rights, and after it got well enough known write a Song around it. So he said I would be a fine egg to give you a joke for nothing.
Will Rogers opens The Illiterate Digest with a letter from a lawyer representing Funk & Wagnalls, publishers of the Literary Digest, threatening legal action over Rogers's use of the phrase “Illiterate Digest” for a film series. Rogers prints the lawyer's letter verbatim, then his own reply—a tactic that immediately establishes the book's combative, self-deprecating tone. The title, he explains, was never meant to mock the Literary Digest but to describe his own haphazard method of collecting sayings. This opening gambit reveals Rogers's willingness to turn a legal threat into comic material, and it sets up a pattern: the book will treat officialdom, civic ceremonies, and media with the same irreverent scrutiny.
The Lawyer's Letter as Comic Device
The inclusion of the full legal correspondence is not mere padding. Rogers lets the lawyer's stiff, formal prose—phrases like “the consequence of which may have escaped your consideration”—stand in stark contrast to his own colloquial voice. By reproducing the letter without comment, he allows readers to see the absurdity of a publisher claiming that a comedian's film title could “lower” the prestige of a weekly magazine. Rogers's reply, printed immediately after, is a model of folksy deflection: he claims ignorance, promises to change the title, and then, in a postscript, asks if he can use “Literary Digest” instead. The exchange functions as a microcosm of the book's method: take a serious or bureaucratic situation, expose its pomposity through direct quotation, and undercut it with a joke that lands on the side of common sense.
Parades, Stadiums, and the Tyranny of Civic Ritual
In a later excerpt, Rogers launches a sustained attack on parades and outdoor speaking events. He describes towns competing to assemble ever-larger human flags, forcing children to stand in the hot sun for hours. His remedy is characteristically practical: set aside one street for parades, and let no one watch. “The minute a Parader sees that no one is watching him he will stop,” he writes. The humor derives from his deadpan enumeration of grievances—parades “stop more work, inconvenience more People, stop more traffic, cause more accidents”—and his refusal to grant them any ceremonial dignity. He extends the critique to stadiums, which he calls “60 acre Fields” where a speaker's voice is ruined. The passage is notable for its specific, almost bureaucratic catalog of complaints, a style that recurs throughout the book.
The Presidential Visit as Case Study in Overplanning
Rogers recounts serving on a reception committee for President Harding's visit to Los Angeles. The committee, he says, decided to take the President to every movie studio to avoid showing partiality, thereby consuming his entire schedule. Rogers's punchline—“Can you imagine being a Guest of the City of Carnegie, Pa., and the Committee showing you through all the Steel mills in Town?”—hinges on a comparison that deflates the movie industry's self-importance. He notes that Harding was allowed only fifteen minutes to visit an aunt, his only relaxation, and that golf, his preferred recreation, was squeezed out. The anecdote is less about Harding than about the absurd logic of committees: they act out of fear of favoritism, producing outcomes that serve no one. Rogers's voice here is that of a practical man bewildered by institutional nonsense.
Readers approaching The Illiterate Digest should expect a collection that moves between set pieces like the lawyer's letter and longer comic essays on American customs. Rogers's persona—the plainspoken cowboy who sees through pretension—is consistent, but the targets vary: civic boosters, the film industry, politicians, and the press. The excerpts suggest that the book's humor depends on specific, often dated references (Harding's 1923 tour, the Literary Digest), but its method of exposing institutional folly through concrete detail remains legible.
That rainy afternoon, Will Rogers’s Illiterate Digest made me laugh at all the fussy rituals people build around themselves. His plain talk felt like a friend’s voice. Later, I found myself thinking about how alike we all are underneath the ceremony, and reached for Bunyan Characters (1st Series) — Story, Setting & Ideas, expecting something heavier—but it simply kept that same quiet, human thread going.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.