The Fiend's Delight — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
The Fiend's Delight — Context and Discussion can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 42,173 words, 3 hr 4 min estimated reading time, and 73 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “American wit and humor,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
You never looked worse in your life than Joab did.
“Now,” said he, “I shall be loved for myself alone. I will change my name, and hie me to pastures new, and all the affection that is then lavished upon me will be pure and disinterested.”
So he strayed off into the woods and came out at old Abner Davis’ ranch. The two things Abner valued most were a windmill and a scratching-post for hogs. They were equally beautiful, and the fame of their comeliness had gone widely abroad. To them Joab naturally paid his attention. The windmill, who was called Lucille Ashtonbury Clifford, received him with expressions of the liveliest disgust. His protestations of affection were met by creakings of contempt, and as he turned sadly away he was rewarded by a sound spank from one of her fans. Like a gentlemanly beef he did not deign to avenge the insult by overturning Lucille Ashtonbury; and it is well for him that he did not, for old Abner stood by with a pitchfork and a trinity of dogs.
Disgusted with the selfish heartlessness of society, Joab shambled off and was passing the scratching-post without noticing her. (Her name was Arabella Cliftonbury Howard.) Suddenly she kicked away a multitude of pigs who were at her feet, and called to the rolling beef of uncanny exterior:
Joab paused, looked at her with his ox-eyes, and gravely marching up, commenced a vigorous scratching against her.
“Arabella,” said he, “do you think you could love a shaggy-hided beef with black hair? Could you love him for himself alone?”
Arabella had observed that the black rubbed off, and the hair lay sleek when stroked the right way.
“Yes, I think so; could you?”
This was a poser: Joab had expected her to talk business. He did not reply. It was only her arch way; she thought, naturally, that the best way to win any body’s love was to be a fool. She saw her mistake. She had associated with hogs all her life, and this fellow was a beef! Mistakes must be rectified very speedily in these matters.
“Sir, I have for you a peculiar feeling; I may say a tenderness. Hereafter you, and you only, shall scratch against Arabella Cliftonbury Howard!”
Joab was delighted; he stayed and scratched all day. He was loved for himself alone, and he did not care for anything but that. Then he went home, made an elaborate toilet, and returned to astonish her. Alas! old Abner had been about, and seeing how Joab had worn her smooth and useless, had cut her down for firewood. Joab gave one glance, then walked solemnly away into a “clearing,” and getting comfortably astride a blazing heap of logs, made a barbacue of himself!
After all, Lucille Ashtonbury Clifford, the light-headed windmill, seems to have got the best of all this. I have observed that the light-headed commonly get the best of everything in this world; which the wooden-headed and the beef-headed regard as an outrage. I am not prepared to say if it is or not.
William Bunker had paid a fine of two hundred dollars for beating his wife. After getting his receipt he went moodily home and seated himself at the domestic hearth. Observing his abstracted and melancholy demeanour, the good wife approached and tenderly inquired the cause. “It’s a delicate subject, dear,” said he, with love-light in his eyes; “let’s talk about something good to eat.”
Then, with true wifely instinct she sought to cheer him up with pleasing prattle of a new bonnet he had promised her. “Ah! darling,” he sighed, absently picking up the fire-poker and turning it in his hands, “let us change the subject.”
Then his soul’s idol chirped an inspiring ballad, kissed him on the top of his head, and sweetly mentioned that the dressmaker had sent in her bill. “Let us talk only of love,” returned he, thoughtfully rolling up his dexter sleeve.
And so she spoke of the vine-enfolded cottage in which she fondly hoped they might soon sip together the conjugal sweets. William became rigidly erect, a look not of earth was in his face, his breast heaved, and the fire-poker quivered with emotion. William felt deeply. “Mine own,” said the good woman, now busily irrigating a mass of snowy dough for the evening meal, “do you know that there is not a bite of meat in the house?”
It is a cold, unlovely truth—a sad, heart-sickening fact—but it must be told by the conscientious novelist. William repaid all this affectionate solicitude—all this womanly devotion, all this trust, confidence, and abnegation in a manner that needs not be particularly specified.
The Fiend's Delight, published in 1873 under the pseudonym Dod Grile, opens with a preface that sets a deliberately provocative tone. Bierce describes the collection as a "cold collation of diabolisms" drawn from California journals, crediting his "scholarly friend Mr. Satan" as collaborator. The dedication to the goddess Good Taste—for her condemnation of superior authors—signals the irreverent stance that pervades the work.
The excerpts reveal a writer who treats violence, religion, and social conventions with equal mockery. In one sketch, horses deliberately kick pedestrians; in another, a gymnasium for pious young women becomes a scene of contortion and absurd piety. Bierce's narrator often adopts a persona of cheerful malice, praising what others condemn and condemning what others praise.
The Devil's Collaborator
The preface establishes a framing device that colors the entire collection. Bierce claims Mr. Satan as his assistant, attributing "most of the views herein set forth" to this worthy gentleman. This is not mere whimsy: it allows the author to voice opinions that would be unacceptable if stated in his own person. The dedication to Good Taste—thanked for condemning superior authors—further undercuts conventional literary values.
This satirical strategy appears throughout the excerpts. When the narrator defends nursing bottles made with lead and antimony, arguing that these substances are "nutritious and essential" to a child's growth, he parodies both scientific alarmism and parental credulity. The mock-serious tone, complete with a fabricated infant voice demanding "oxysulphuret of antimony," shows Bierce's method: taking a position so extreme that it exposes the absurdity of the original argument.
Violence as Punchline
Physical harm recurs as a source of humor in these sketches. The horses that "take a fiendish delight" in kicking pedestrians are described with a straight-faced analysis of their tactics: feigning sleep, then discharging their feet "without a preliminary yawn." The narrator notes that the damage is "merely nominal" when the victim is a "worthless Italian fisherman, market gardener, or decayed gentleman."
This casual cruelty extends to the preface's boast: "I think I have killed a good many people in one way or another; but the reader will please to observe that they were not people worth the trouble of leaving alive." The humor depends on the reader recognizing the gap between the narrator's callousness and ordinary human sympathy. Bierce does not soften the blow with euphemism; he sharpens it.
Piety and Contortion
One extended excerpt describes a gymnasium in a San Francisco temple where young women perform acrobatic feats. The narrator names them with biblical resonance—Rachel, Ruth, Hannah, Mehitable Ann, Jerusha—and describes their exercises in language that blends religious devotion with physical absurdity. Jerusha "ties herself in a double bow-knot, and meditates upon the doctrine of election."
The passage culminates in a mock-ecstatic outburst: "O, blessed temple of grace divine! O, innocence and youth and simple faith! O, water and molasses and unsalted butter!" The juxtaposition of sacred and mundane—"niceness absolute and godly whey"—reveals Bierce's technique of deflating piety by treating it as a physical performance. The narrator wishes he were "female, and Christian, and immature" so he could "contort and musculate with much satisfaction of soul."
Readers approaching The Fiend's Delight should expect a work that consistently undermines earnestness. Bierce's persona as Dod Grile allows him to praise what is normally condemned and condemn what is normally praised, creating a sustained ironic distance. The collection's structure—mixing fiction, tall talk, obituaries, and verse—reflects its origins in periodical publication. Each piece rewards attention to the specific targets of its mockery, which range from religious enthusiasm to scientific alarmism to the casual violence of urban life.
I kept thinking about how Bierce’s wicked little sketches follow you like a shadow, laughing at everything we take seriously. It reminded me of something quieter—a walking anthology that lets you step outside your own head for a while. The Footpath Way: An Anthology for Walkers — Edition Insights felt like that kind of company, unhurried and strangely warm.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.