Post-Augustan Poetry From Seneca to Juvenal — Story, Setting & Ideas

(0 User reviews) 307

In Category - Adventure Picaresque Fiction

Authors: Butler, Harold Edgeworth, 1878-1951 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2005 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Latin poetry -- History and criticism; Rome -- In literature Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 115,766

Reading time 504 min

Text sections 11

The source record for Post-Augustan Poetry From Seneca to Juvenal — Story, Setting & Ideas measures this digital text at 115,766 words, 8 hr 24 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 19.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Latin poetry -- History and criticism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #9303

Butler's 1908 study examines Silver Latin poets from Seneca to Juvenal, arguing their merits despite rhetorical excess. The preface and chapter on Valerius Flaccus reveal a critic balancing technical analysis with defense of neglected authors.

Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg9303

Read the Text

o was he? p. 152. Debt to Vergil, p. 152. Elaboration of style, p. 153. Obscurity, affectation and insignificance, p. 154. Einsiedeln fragments; was the author Calpurnius Piso? p. 156. _Panegyricus in Pisonem,_ p. 157. Graceful elaboration, p. 158. Was the author Calpurnius Siculus? p. 159.

Early translations of _Iliad,_ p. 160. Attius Labeo, p. 160. Polybius p. 161. _Ilias Latina,_ a summary in verse, p. 161. Date, p. 162. Authorship: the question of the acrostic, p. 162. Wrongly attributed to Silius Italicus. p. 163.

Gaetulicus, p. 163. Caesius Bassua, p. 164.

EMPERORS AND MINOR POETS, 70-117 A.D.

I. EMPERORS AND POETS WHOSE WORKS ARE LOST

Vespasian and Titus, p. 166. Domitian. The Agon Capitolinus and Agon Albanus, p. 167. Literary characteristics of the Flavian age, p. 168. Saleius Bassus, Serranus, and others, p. 169. Nerva, p. 169. Trajan, p. 170. Passennus Paulus, p. 170. Sentius Augurinus, p. 171. Pliny the Younger, p. 172. Almost entire disappearance of poetry after Hadrian. p. 174.

Sulpicia, a lyric poetess, p. 174. Martial's admiration for her, p. 175. Characteristics of her work, p. 176. Her Satire, p. 176. Is it genuine? p. 177.

Epic in the Flavian age, p. 179. Who was Valerius? His date, p. 180. The _Argonautica_, unfinished, p. 181. Its general design, p. 182. Merits and defects of the Argonaut-saga as a subject for epic, p. 183. Valerius' debt to Apollonius Rhodius, p. 183. Novelties introduced in treatment; Jason, p. 184; Medea, p. 185. Valerius has a better general conception as to how the story should be told, but is far inferior as a poet, p. 186. Obscure learning; lack of humour, p. 187. Involved language, p. 188. Preciosity; compression, p. 189. Real poetic merit: compared with Statius and Lucan, p. 191. Debt to Vergil, p. 191. Metre, p. 192. Brilliant descriptive power, p. 193. Suggestion of mystery, p. 193. Sense of colour, p. 195. Similes, p. 195. Speeches, p. 197. The loves of Jason and Medea, p. 198. General estimate, p. 200.

Life, p. 202. Character, p. 205. The _Thebais_; its high average level, p. 206. Statius a miniature painter, p, 207. Weakness of the Theban-saga as a subject for epic, p. 208. Consequent lack of proportion and unity in _Thebais_, p. 210. Vergil too closely imitated, p. 211. Digressions, p. 212. Character-drawing superficial, p. 213. Tydeus, p. 214. Amphiaraus, p. 216. Parthenopaeus and other characters, p. 218. Atmosphere that of literature rather than life, p. 220. Fine descriptive passages, p. 221. Dexterity, often degenerating into preciosity, p. 224. Similes, p. 225. Metre, p. 226. The _Achilleis_, p. 227. The _Silvae_, p. 227. Flattery of Domitian, p. 228. Extraordinary preciosity, p. 229. Prettiness and insincerity, p. 230. Brilliant miniature-painting, p. 232. The _Genethliacon Lucani_, p. 233. Invocation to Sleep, p. 234. Conclusion, p. 235.

Life, p. 236. Weakness of historical epic, p. 238. Disastrous intrusion of mythology, p. 239. Plagiarism from Vergil, p. 240. Skill in composition of early books, p. 240. Inadequate treatment of closing scenes of the war, p. 241. The characters, p. 241. Total absence of any real poetic gifts, p. 242. Regulus, p. 244. The death of Paulus, p. 246. Fabius Cunctator, p. 247. Conclusion, p. 249.

Life, p. 251. The epigram, p. 258. Martial's temperament, p. 259. Gift of style, p. 260. Satirical tone, good-humoured and non-moral, p. 261. Obscenity, p. 263. Capacity for friendship, p. 264. His dislike of Rome, p. 267. His love of the country, p. 268. Comparison with Silvae of Statius, p. 271. Flattery of Domitian, p. 271. Laments for the dead, p. 272. Emotion as a rule sacrificed to point, p. 275. The laureate of triviality, p. 276. Martial as a client, p. 277. His snobbery, p. 279. Redeeming features; polish and wit, p. 281. The one perfect post-Augustan stylist, p. 284. Vivid picture of contemporary society, p. 285.

Life, p. 287. Date of satires, p. 289. Motives (Sat, i), p. 291. Themes of the various satires; third satire, p. 293; fourth, fifth, and sixth satires, p. 294; seventh and eighth satires; signs of waning power, p. 295; tenth satire, p. 296; eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth satires, p. 297; fifteenth and sixteenth satires, showing further decline of power, p. 298. Juvenal's narrow Roman ideals; hatred of the foreigner, p. 299. Exaggeration, p. 301. Coarseness, p. 303. Vividness of description, p. 304. Mordant epigram and rhetoric, p. 308. Moral and religious ideals, p. 311. _Sententiae_, p. 315. Poetry, p. 316. Metre, p. 317. The one great poet of the Silver Age, p. 317.

INDEX OF NAMES, p. 321

THE DECLINE OF POST-AUGUSTAN POETRY

During the latter years of the principate of Augustus a remarkable change in literary methods and style begins to make itself felt. The gradual extinction of the great luminaries is followed by a gradual disappearance of originality and of the natural and easy-flowing style whose phrases and felicities adorn, without overloading or obscuring the sense. In their place comes a straining after effect, a love of startling colour, produced now by over-gorgeous or over-minute imagery, now by a surfeit of brilliant epigram, while controlling good sense and observance of due proportion are often absent and imitative preciosity too frequently masquerades as originality. Further, in too many cases there is a complete absence of moral enthusiasm, close observation, and genuine insight.

What were the causes of this change? Was it due mainly to the evil influence of the principate or to more subtle and deep-rooted causes?

Continue Reading →

Butler opens his preface by stating his aim to provide 'something of an introduction to the poetical literature of the post-Augustan age,' immediately acknowledging that few of these writers 'have any claim to be called poets of the first order.' He positions his work as a corrective to 'unduly sweeping condemnation,' promising to 'detach and illustrate their excellences without in any way passing over their defects.' This dual commitment—fairness without flattery—shapes the entire study.

The preface also reveals Butler's method: he excludes Manilius and Phaedrus as belonging 'rather to the Augustan period,' showing his careful periodization. His acknowledgments to Schanz, Teufel, and Friedländer signal a scholarly foundation, while thanks to Gilbert Murray and Nowell Smith hint at the literary-critical lens he will apply.

Butler's Critical Stance: Defense Without Apology

The preface establishes Butler's tone: he is neither a debunker nor a panegyrist. He concedes that some poets 'stand very low in the scale of poetry' but insists that 'their undeniable weaknesses tend in many cases to obscure their real merits.' This balanced approach is evident in his treatment of Valerius Flaccus, whom he calls 'more uneven' than Statius but possessing 'a more kindling and penetrating imagination.'

Butler's defense of Valerius is particularly instructive. He notes that Valerius 'offends less than any of the Silver Latin writers of epic' in ranting and exaggeration, yet admits he 'has been strangely neglected.' The critic's own preferences emerge: he values 'simplicity and directness of thought' over rhetoric, and praises Valerius for having 'a finer ear for music and rhythm.'

Readers should note how Butler uses comparison to position each poet. He ranks Valerius 'close to Statius, and not far below Lucan,' then immediately qualifies: Lucan is 'incomparably the superior' in genius, but Valerius 'never sins against taste and reason to the same extent.' This layered judgment invites readers to weigh competing criteria.

Technical Analysis: Meter, Diction, and Influence

Butler's close reading of Valerius Flaccus exemplifies his technical focus. He criticizes Valerius for weakening his hexameter by 'succumbing to the powerful influence of Ovid,' showing a preference for dactyls over spondees and shrinking from elision. He also notes that Valerius 'does not understand how to vary his pauses,' leading to 'wearisome monotony.'

Yet Butler balances this with praise: Valerius's 'individual lines have a force and beauty that is comparatively rare in the Thebais.' He quotes lines describing a sea-cave—'non quae dona die, non quae trahat aetheris ignem'—and the echo of Hylas—'rursus Hylan et rursus Hylan per longa reclamat avia'—to demonstrate 'picturesqueness of expression' and 'beauty of sound.'

Butler's method is comparative throughout. He contrasts Valerius's relation to Vergil with Persius's relation to Horace, calling it 'a half-truth.' He also compares Valerius's verse unfavorably to Statius's in pause variation, but favorably in 'poetic feeling as distinct from rhetoric.' These technical judgments ground his broader claims.

The Silver Age Context: Decadence and Its Causes

Butler's first chapter, 'The Decline of Post-Augustan Poetry,' sets the stage by examining external influences: the principate, imperial patronage under Tiberius through Nero, and the 'decay of Roman character.' He also cites the 'greatness of Augustan poets' as 'a bar to farther advance,' and the rhetorical education system that fostered 'absence of true educational spirit.'

These contextual factors explain the 'undeniable weaknesses' Butler acknowledges. The chapter's headings—'Recitations,' 'Results of these influences'—suggest a sociological approach to literary history. Butler implies that poets like Valerius wrote within constraints that shaped their style, for better and worse.

Readers should watch how Butler applies this framework in later chapters. His judgment that Valerius 'has less rhetoric' than Statius, for instance, gains weight when set against the broader claim that the age was dominated by rhetorical excess. The preface's promise to 'detach and illustrate excellences' thus becomes a method of resisting deterministic readings.

Reading the Excerpts: What the Text Reveals

The excerpts provided offer a concentrated view of Butler's critical practice. In the preface, he explicitly states his aim and method. In the Valerius Flaccus section, he demonstrates that method through detailed analysis of meter, diction, and comparative ranking. The chapter on decline, though not excerpted in full, is referenced in the table of contents and shapes the argument.

Notable is Butler's use of quotation: he reproduces Latin lines with English translations, then comments on their sound and sense. His description of Valerius's sea-cave lines as showing 'force and beauty' is supported by the quoted text. His claim that Valerius 'has something of the true Vergilian glamour' is a specific, testable assertion.

Because the excerpts are incomplete, readers cannot assess Butler's treatment of Seneca, Persius, or Juvenal. But the pattern is clear: he combines historical context, technical criticism, and comparative judgment. His voice is authoritative yet measured, willing to praise but also to specify defects.

Butler's study rewards readers who attend to his critical vocabulary—words like 'rhetoric,' 'technique,' 'imagination,' and 'music' carry precise meanings. His comparisons among poets are not mere rankings but attempts to define different kinds of poetic achievement. As you read, note how he balances historical explanation with close reading, and how his judgments often hinge on a single quoted line. This is a work of literary criticism that expects its readers to engage with both the Latin text and the critic's argument.

That rainy afternoon, Butler’s defense of neglected poets—their noisy, uneven passion—felt like a quiet act of kindness. I closed Post-Augustan Poetry thinking how we rarely revisit what we’ve dismissed. Then, idly, my hand found The Spirit of Christmas — Inside the Classic, a book with its own gentle reclamation project. Both seemed to whisper: even the overlooked holds a steady light.