Principle in Art, Etc. — Key Ideas to Explore

(0 User reviews)   527
Patmore, Coventry, 1823-1896 Project Gutenberg 2018 Not confirmed
Literature -- History and criticism; Art Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 48,956
Reading time 213 min
Text sections 5

Before opening Principle in Art, Etc. — Key Ideas to Explore, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 48,956 words, 3 hr 33 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 33.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Literature -- History and criticism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Coventry Patmore's 1889 collection of essays argues for a principled, intellectual criticism in art and literature, with sharp assessments of poets like Clough, Shelley, and Keats, and a strong emphasis on moral and aesthetic integrity.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

re the way in which she is given to smiling through them. The author of the _Rhetoric_ shows his usual incomparable subtilty of observation when he notes that a little good coming upon or in the midst of extremity of evil is a source of the sharpest pathos; and when the shaft of a passionate female sorrow is feathered with beauty and pointed with a smile there is no heart that can refuse her her will. In absolute and uncontrolled suffering there is no pathos. Nothing in the _Inferno_ has this quality except the passage of Paolo and Francesca, still embracing, through the fiery drift. It is the embrace that makes the pathos, “tempering extremities with extreme sweet,” or at least with the memory of it. Our present sorrows generally owe their grace of pathos to their “crown,” which is “remembering happier things.” No one weeps in sympathy with the “base self-pitying tears” of Thersites, or with those of any whose grief is without some contrasting dignity of curb. Even a little child does not move us by its sorrow, when expressed by tears and cries, a tenth part so much as by the quivering lip of attempted self-control. A great and present evil, coupled with a distant and uncertain hope, is also a source of pathos; if indeed it be not the same with that which Aristotle describes as arising from the sequence of exceeding ill and a little good. There is pathos in a departing pleasure, however small. It is the fact of sunset, not its colours--which are the same as those of sunrise--that constitutes its sadness; and in mere darkness there may be fear and distress, but not pathos. There are few things so pathetic in literature as the story of the supper which Amelia, in Fielding’s novel, had prepared for her husband, and to which he did not come, and that of Colonel Newcome becoming a Charterhouse pensioner. In each of these cases the pathos arises wholly from the contrast of noble reticence with a sorrow which has no direct expression. The same necessity for contrast renders reconciliations far more pathetic than quarrels, and the march to battle of an army to the sound of cheerful military music more able to draw tears than the spectacle of the battle itself.

The soul of pathos, like that of wit, is brevity. Very few writers are sufficiently aware of this. Humour is cumulative and diffusive, as Shakespeare, Rabelais, and Dickens well knew; but how many a good piece of pathos has been spoiled by the historian of Little Nell by an attempt to make too much of it! A drop of citric acid will give poignancy to a feast; but a draught of it----! Hence it is doubtful whether an English eye ever shed a tear over the _Vita Nuova_, whatever an Italian may have done. Next to the patient endurance of heroism, the bewilderment of weakness is the most fruitful source of pathos. Hence the exquisitely touching points in _A Pair of Blue Eyes_, _Two on a Tower_, _The Trumpet-Major_, and other of Hardy’s novels.

Pathos is the luxury of grief, and when it ceases to be other than a keen-edged pleasure it ceases to be pathos. Hence Tennyson’s question in “Love and Duty,” “Shall sharpest pathos blight us?” involves a misunderstanding of the word; although his understanding of the thing is well proved by such lyrics as “Tears, idle tears,” and “O well for the fisherman’s boy.” Pleasure and beauty--which may be said to be pleasure visible--are without their highest perfection if they are without a touch of pathos. This touch, indeed, accrues naturally to profound pleasure and to great beauty by the mere fact of the incongruity of their earthly surroundings and the sense of isolation, peril, and impermanence caused thereby. It is a doctrine of that inexhaustible and (except by Dante) almost unworked mine of poetry, Catholic theology, that the felicity of the angels and glorified saints and of God Himself would not be perfect without the edge of pathos, which it receives from the fall and reconciliation of man. Hence, on Holy Saturday the Church exclaims, “O felix culpa!” and hence “there is more joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth than over ninety and nine righteous who need no repentance.” Sin, says St. Augustine, is the necessary shadow of heaven; and pardon, says some other, is the highest light of its beatitude.

Coventry Patmore opens Principle in Art, Etc. by distinguishing true criticism from the popular 'pseudo-criticism' that merely delights by sympathy with sensations. For Patmore, genuine criticism 'appeals to the intellect' and rebukes both artist and reader for ignorance and mistakes. This judicial stance, he argues, removes hindrances to art by preparing a public capable of acknowledging it. The collection, comprising essays mostly from the St. James’s Gazette, applies this standard to figures such as Keats, Shelley, Blake, Rossetti, Swinburne, Clough, and Emerson, as well as to architectural principles. Patmore’s voice is authoritative, often dismissive, and consistently concerned with the moral and intellectual foundations of artistic achievement.

Criticism as Intellectual Judgment

Patmore insists that criticism requires 'judicial qualification,' not merely a natural sensitiveness to beauty. He likens bad art to steam in a cylinder that collapses at the contact of cold water—true criticism, he claims, can collapse bad art 'at the contact of its breath.' This mechanistic metaphor underscores his belief that criticism is a rigorous, almost scientific discipline. He laments that the past half-century has produced floods of pseudo-criticism that expand our sensations rather than rebuke our ignorance. For Patmore, the enunciation of a single principle can 'almost at a blow' transform the artistic landscape. This opening essay sets the tone for the entire volume: a defense of principled, intellectual judgment over impressionistic appreciation.

Clough’s Character Over His Verse

In his essay on Arthur Hugh Clough, Patmore makes a striking concession: Clough’s writings 'teach no new truth,' yet they may 'inflame the love of truth.' Patmore attributes Clough’s posthumous reputation not to literary merit but to his personal character. He writes that Clough 'was personally far more impressive than his works,' and that 'the halo of this sanctity hangs... about all that he has done, and renders cold criticism of it almost impossible.' Patmore diagnoses Clough’s weakness as an excess of the 'impressionable and feminine element' over masculine intellectual power. The result, he argues, is a poetry of endless lamentation over problems that cannot sing. This section reveals Patmore’s willingness to separate the man from the work, and his preference for intellectual tenacity over emotional sincerity.

The Limits of Genius and the Negative Type

Patmore’s essay 'The Limitations of Genius' and his treatment of 'The Poetry of Negation' extend his critique of intellectual weakness. He dismisses Emerson as 'at his very best... only a brilliant metaphysical epigrammatist,' never approaching greatness. Clough, he notes, was 'curiously attracted' to Emerson, a fact that underscores Clough’s own lack of intellectual power. Patmore contrasts the negative type—those who can see no light where light is most necessary—with the believer who, like Richard Hooker, finds comfort in the longing to believe. For Patmore, the true poet must possess 'the tenacity of spirit which cleaves to and assimilates the truth when it is found.' This insistence on moral and intellectual commitment shapes his judgments throughout the collection.

Architectural Principles and the Unity of Art

The final essays turn to architecture, where Patmore applies the same principles of intellectual judgment. In 'Architectural Styles,' he summarizes views he had stated thirty years earlier in the Edinburgh Review, offering what he hopes will be 'an example of the kind of criticism' he advocates. He treats architecture as a test case for his broader theory: that art must be governed by principle, not by mere taste or fashion. The essay on 'Ideal and Material Greatness in Architecture' continues this theme, arguing that true greatness arises from the union of ideal conception and material execution. Patmore’s architectural criticism is less well-known than his literary essays, but it demonstrates the consistency of his method across different arts.

Patmore’s Principle in Art, Etc. rewards readers who share his appetite for rigorous, often combative criticism. His judgments are specific and grounded in a clear hierarchy of values: intellectual power over emotional susceptibility, principled judgment over impressionistic delight. Readers should approach these essays as a series of provocations rather than a systematic treatise. Patmore’s voice is distinctive—sometimes arrogant, often perceptive—and his willingness to rank and dismiss makes him a bracing companion for anyone interested in Victorian aesthetic debates.

Patmore’s insistence on moral integrity in art reminds me how rarely criticism feels like a quiet conviction rather than a performance. That same earnest, searching quality seems to inhabit The Altruist in Politics — Background and Themes, where principle wrestles with practice. I recall reading both in different seasons, each leaving a faint, lasting ache for coherence.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks